Saturday, January 23, 2010

Temple

Just came back from attending the temple in Provo. The first time this year, during the weekend when my wife is out in California helping a friend with a wedding. Needless to say it was lonely, but I was blessed to see a former missionary from my mission as well as 3 good friends from Brazil. I could not have asked for better company at the temple, considering my current situation :)
Every time I leave the temple I cannot help but wonder what makes people so upset about it. There is nothing more spiritual than to visit the House of the Lord and remember the things he has done for us out of pure love. I leave with a stronger desire to follow Christ and to be a better person to everyone around me.

Have a wonderful week, whoever happens to read this!

Portugues - Templo
Acabei de voltar de uma sessao no templo de Provo, Utah. Foi a primeira vez no ano, justamente no fim de semana onde minha esposa esta na California ajudando uma amiga com um casamento. Nem preciso mencionar que estava me sentindo a sos, mas fui abencoado de ter assistido a uma sessao no templo com 1 ex-missionaria da minha missao e com 3 outros amigos brasileiros. Eu nao poderia ter pedido por companhia melhor - considerando minha situacao :)
Toda vez que saio do templo eu fico incredulo sobre o que faz pessoas terem sentimentos tao negativos para com o templo. Nao tem nada mais espiritual do que visitar a Casa do Senhor e lembrar das coisas que ele fez por nos por puro amor. Saio sempre com um desejo renovado de seguir a Cristo e de tratar melhor as pessoas ao meu redor.
Tenham todos uma excelente semana, seja la quem estiver lendo isso!

Monday, October 19, 2009

Why people hate Mormons?

I am amazed by the amount of hate that there is against people of the LDS faith. I was reading a blog about religion for one of my religious courses as part of my major and found that many people focus more on disproving LDS doctrines than to teach other people about Jesus Christ.
One website, thinkabouteternity.com, has 6 paragraphs dealing with their beliefs. The rest of the website either gives reasons why they chose to attack other religions, many of them being christhian churches, and to disprove these churches doctrines or gives links to other sites that use sophistry to missinterpret other people's faiths. In fact, they say at the end of their page on "mission statement" that "If you feel like anything in these pages is a personal attack against you, that should raise a red flag for you about the nature of the teaching and conditioning you are receiving at the hands of your religious institution or leaders." Chosing to blame other religions for the way people feel when their doctrines are missinterpreted by missionformed people is a weak argument for the truth they proclaim.
Now, the people responsible for the site must remember the two greatest commandments: FIRST - Love God with all thy heart, might and mind. SECOND - Love thy neighbour as thyself (Mark 12:30-31). I visited the official website of the seventh day adventist church, www.adventist.org, which is one of the churches condemned in the eternity site, and could find nothing in it attacking other religions. I did find a statement in the site saying that "The Adventist church is committed to the principle meaning of religious freedom: The differences in religions, throughout the world, should be respected. What we choose to believe and how we choose to worship should be according to the dictates of our conscience." (http://www.adventist.org/mission_and_service/religious_liberty.html.en). When I served as a missionary in Arizona I was priviledged to meet a pastor for a Brazilian Branch of an Adventist church. It has been 2 years since I met them, but I still remember the meeting. My mission companion and I were very well received by him and the congregation, being invited to participate at their meetings and socials. I attended one of their meetings and found that nothing in it was demeaning to my faith or to any other faith; all they taught was to believe in the Lord, to repent while you still have time, and about the importance of worshiping him every week at church . Following their service me and a group of 4 other brazillian missionaries took them on a tour of the LDS churche's visitor center in Mesa, Arizona. We presented them a copy of "The Family: a Proclamation to the World" (which contains doctrines of the LDS church on families and their importance) and watched a movie about the life and mission of the prophet Joseph Smith. The pastor and all of the members were friendly and corteous with us, watching all we presented to them with and open mind and friendly eyes, and so did us when we visited with them in their meeting. Both the Adventist and the LDS church followed the command of Jesus to love God and our neighbour as ourself, and nobody got hurt. Isn't that wonderful? It's certainly miraculous in today's world.
Of course, both the Seventh Day Adventist church and my Church do missionary work around the world. Both churches feel their message is of importance to the world and that people must listen to it. We might even convert each others members at times. But as far as I could tell, the ideals of both churches is to teach their own doctrines and to respect other people's beliefs, and never to act in a way that would encourage contention. There is nothing wrong about this. I am glad that God will be the judge and will do so according to the desires of the person's heart. No one will be denied a perfect opportunity to listen to the true gospel of the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ. To say that one can only be saved if they hear the message of Jesus in this life is to condemn the millions of people who never heard of the name of Christ in this life. Before the judgment comes, all will have received such an opportunity and have a fair chance to accept it. This is what God means when he says that he is a Just God.
So, what now? Because we are to avoid fighting like children for a candy are we to remain passive about our faith and not share it to others, hoping ours is the true one? Are we to contend with other people's beliefs at every opportunity we can, thinking that Jesus would've done the same thing? Or can we share our beliefs with others while still respecting their own? Jainism teaches the concept of Ahimsa, or non-violence towards people and animals, be it physical, emotional or spiritual. Confucius taught much about the importance of being kind to others, since this is the way one can create a moral society. Buddhists believe all religions are a form of buddhism, the form that you can accept better in this stage of your life, so they are peaceful towards all views of God. Skinism believes all religion believe in the True Name, call it God, Jesus, Brahman, or whatever you may. Adventists profess freedom of religion to others, as do Mormons. The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ teaches that "This is not my [Jesus's] doctrine, to stir up the hearts of men with anger, one against the other; but this is my doctrine, that such things must be done away" (3 Nephi 11:30, emphasys and brackets added). Wouldn't it be nice if religious bigotry was something of the past from now on, and all that people do would be to teach their own beliefs instead of demeaning others?
Last of all, if you want to know really what a Mormon, Jainist, Seventh-Day Adventist, or Mason believe ask them, not a website that advocates the doctrine of contention, which is not of Christ and therefore not Christhian.

Sunday, July 6, 2008

Bishops and Stake Presidents

Bishops and Stake Presidents


It has been a while since I’ve posted on my blog, mainly because life is busy and I forgot for a moment that I actually had a blog going. I was surfing the internet just in curiosity to know what I would find if I would type “Mormon” on the search menu. It is incredible to see how much opposition there is towards the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It seems like we are a secretive cult whose purpose is to create a “safe haven” for abuse to occur: power, control, both physical and emotional. How glad am I to find out the truth about my religion of choice from such men! What made me even more convinced of these atrocities was the fact that most of these men who showed me the “truth” were men who never set foot on a LDS chapel.

I will not discuss their motives. As a Christian I am a firm believer of religious freedom, in allowing everyone to worship what or who they may. Christ himself has taught this when one of his disciples saw one doing miracles but who did not follow them as follows:


“And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him, because he followeth not with us. And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us” (KJV Luke 9:49-50)


A true Christian shows devotion by its actions. Let each person who demeans other religions begin living like true followers of the Prince of Peace. My objective in this post is to share some experiences I’ve had with bishops and stake presidents throughout my life, so that misconceptions may be corrected.


A brief explanation of bishops and stake presidents: each LDS congregation is called a Ward, and each ward has a Bishop who has the responsibility to watch over the members of the congregation, taking care of their needs. A group of different local wards form a Stake, and the stake president watches over all members of those wards he is responsible over. Stake presidents are chosen by inspiration by church leaders (the seventies and Apostles), whereas each bishop is selected by the stake president and upon approval from the Apostles are called to serve as bishops for a number of years. My dad, for instance, served twice as a stake president in Brazil, from 1993 to 1997, and from 1997 to the year 2000, both in different stakes. After their service is over, they are assigned other responsibilities in their congregations.

(picture: my dad and my mom)
I watched my dad through all those years of service as a stake president. He was a very busy man with his profession as an employee to a company that armored cars in Brazil, and his calling as a stake president added to his time load. He would, on occasions, arrive around 10pm at home as he met with different people who needed some council or were resolving a transgression. He never discussed with us – or with my mom – the issues he was resolving with the people, but he would mention how much he loved them. I remember once in Sao Paulo, Brazil, him talking about how one individual had confessed some serious sins to him. He met with the man for several months, and finally the man was able to overcome his difficulty and regain full status as a member of the Church. Never will I forget my dad’s emotion with sharing this experience! It was evident by the way he spoke that watching the man change even his outlook on life was worth all the tardies at home and evenings at the office. My father is my greatest example of how selfless service for the Lord blesses lives: his, in this case, mine because I wanted to experience something similar one day (which I did as a missionary in Arizona), and this man whom I know not his name.


My bishop at my current ward has recently met with me at my request. I wanted to ask him some council and suggestions for what I’m currently going through in my life, and his inspired words have helped me find the answers I was seeking. How grateful I am to know I have leaders whom I can trust and confide with to help me through this challenging world. The Lord is wise when he said that “by their fruits ye shall know them”.


Such is the work of a stake president and a bishop. The problem is that, just as there are people who accept council and suggestions from leaders, there are others who take offence. These are the ones who attack the church by calling them “snake presidents”. By revelation, any church leader who violates his calling through abuse will be judged by it and condemned for the transgression by the Lord except he repents. I quote the Doctrine and Covenants:


“And even the bishop, who is a judge, and his councilors, if they are not faithful…, shall be condemned, and others shall be planted in their stead” (D&C 64:40)


For more information on how the church deals with abusers, the following link is suggested:


http://www.newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/public-issues/child-abuse


How about this? When we feel like putting someone else’s beliefs or religion down, why don’t we turn it around and consider first how we would like to be treated by others? As O.G Mandino would say in his book “The Greatest Salesman in the World”,


Always will I dig for reasons to applaud; never will I scratch for excuses to gossip…, henceforth will I love all mankind. From this moment all hate is left from my veins for I have not time to hate, only time to love. From this moment I take the first step required to become a man among men.”

Thursday, June 12, 2008

A reference for all of us

The nature of God has been discussed extensivelly throughout all ages of the World. Undoubtebly the existence of God cannot be disproven or proven by science, for arguments that seem to "ring" in the ear can be made both ways. "If there is a God, how was he created?" or "How can the development of tiny cells into the human eye be credited to luck only?" One must be willing to listen to both sides of the story without contempt if understanding is to be reached on the subject. I've found during my missionary service that questions like this are better answered by personal experience on the subject and by inviting the other party to, in private, ask God himself concerning its existance.
If His existance is not only an item of discussion, what to say about who is He? Can he walk? Does he talk? What does he look like? Could we call him a He? Is he One? Is He a separate individual from Jesus Christ like me and you? Many people get taken back when they hear their LDS friends saying “God is our Heavenly Father”, that “He is a Man like us, only perfect”, “that we are created in his own image”, that Jesus Christ is His literal Son, etc. Recently one Apostle has given a very good talk on the nature of the Godhead, explaining simply and straightforwardly the doctrines of the Church on the matter. One must follow the council given in the Book of Mormon concerning spiritual truth: “ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true… [and] if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you by the power of the Holy Ghost” (Moroni 10:4-5).

The Only True God and Jesus Christ Whom He Hath Sent
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

We declare it is self-evident from the scriptures that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are separate persons, three divine beings.
As Elder Ballard noted earlier in this session, various crosscurrents of our times have brought increasing public attention to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Lord told the ancients this latter-day work would be “a marvellous work and a wonder,”1 and it is. But even as we invite one and all to examine closely the marvel of it, there is one thing we would not like anyone to wonder about—that is whether or not we are “Christians.”
By and large any controversy in this matter has swirled around two doctrinal issues—our view of the Godhead and our belief in the principle of continuing revelation leading to an open scriptural canon. In addressing this we do not need to be apologists for our faith, but we would like not to be misunderstood. So with a desire to increase understanding and unequivocally declare our Christianity, I speak today on the first of those two doctrinal issues just mentioned.
Our first and foremost article of faith in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is “We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost.”2 We believe these three divine persons constituting a single Godhead are united in purpose, in manner, in testimony, in mission. We believe Them to be filled with the same godly sense of mercy and love, justice and grace, patience, forgiveness, and redemption. I think it is accurate to say we believe They are one in every significant and eternal aspect imaginable except believing Them to be three persons combined in one substance, a Trinitarian notion never set forth in the scriptures because it is not true.
Indeed no less a source than the stalwart Harper’s Bible Dictionary records that “the formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the [New Testament].”3
So any criticism that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not hold the contemporary Christian view of God, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost is not a comment about our commitment to Christ but rather a recognition (accurate, I might add) that our view of the Godhead breaks with post–New Testament Christian history and returns to the doctrine taught by Jesus Himself. Now, a word about that post–New Testament history might be helpful.
In the year A.D. 325 the Roman emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea to address—among other things—the growing issue of God’s alleged “trinity in unity.” What emerged from the heated contentions of churchmen, philosophers, and ecclesiastical dignitaries came to be known (after another 125 years and three more major councils)4 as the Nicene Creed, with later reformulations such as the Athanasian Creed. These various evolutions and iterations of creeds—and others to come over the centuries—declared the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost to be abstract, absolute, transcendent, immanent, consubstantial, coeternal, and unknowable, without body, parts, or passions and dwelling outside space and time. In such creeds all three members are separate persons, but they are a single being, the oft-noted “mystery of the trinity.” They are three distinct persons, yet not three Gods but one. All three persons are incomprehensible, yet it is one God who is incomprehensible.
We agree with our critics on at least that point—that such a formulation for divinity is truly incomprehensible. With such a confusing definition of God being imposed upon the church, little wonder that a fourth-century monk cried out, “Woe is me! They have taken my God away from me, . . . and I know not whom to adore or to address.”5 How are we to trust, love, worship, to say nothing of strive to be like, One who is incomprehensible and unknowable? What of Jesus’s prayer to His Father in Heaven that “this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent”?6
It is not our purpose to demean any person’s belief nor the doctrine of any religion. We extend to all the same respect for their doctrine that we are asking for ours. (That, too, is an article of our faith.) But if one says we are not Christians because we do not hold a fourth- or fifth-century view of the Godhead, then what of those first Christian Saints, many of whom were eyewitnesses of the living Christ, who did not hold such a view either?7
We declare it is self-evident from the scriptures that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are separate persons, three divine beings, noting such unequivocal illustrations as the Savior’s great Intercessory Prayer just mentioned, His baptism at the hands of John, the experience on the Mount of Transfiguration, and the martyrdom of Stephen—to name just four.
With these New Testament sources and more8 ringing in our ears, it may be redundant to ask what Jesus meant when He said, “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do.”9 On another occasion He said, “I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.”10 Of His antagonists He said, “[They have] . . . seen and hated both me and my Father.”11 And there is, of course, that always deferential subordination to His Father that had Jesus say, “Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.”12 “My father is greater than I.”13
To whom was Jesus pleading so fervently all those years, including in such anguished cries as “O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me”14 and “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me”?15 To acknowledge the scriptural evidence that otherwise perfectly united members of the Godhead are nevertheless separate and distinct beings is not to be guilty of polytheism; it is, rather, part of the great revelation Jesus came to deliver concerning the nature of divine beings. Perhaps the Apostle Paul said it best: “Christ Jesus . . . being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.”16
A related reason The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is excluded from the Christian category by some is because we believe, as did the ancient prophets and apostles, in an embodied—but certainly glorified—God.17 To those who criticize this scripturally based belief, I ask at least rhetorically: If the idea of an embodied God is repugnant, why are the central doctrines and singularly most distinguishing characteristics of all Christianity the Incarnation, the Atonement, and the physical Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ? If having a body is not only not needed but not desirable by Deity, why did the Redeemer of mankind redeem His body, redeeming it from the grasp of death and the grave, guaranteeing it would never again be separated from His spirit in time or eternity?18 Any who dismiss the concept of an embodied God dismiss both the mortal and the resurrected Christ. No one claiming to be a true Christian will want to do that.
Now, to anyone within the sound of my voice who has wondered regarding our Christianity, I bear this witness. I testify that Jesus Christ is the literal, living Son of our literal, living God. This Jesus is our Savior and Redeemer who, under the guidance of the Father, was the Creator of heaven and earth and all things that in them are. I bear witness that He was born of a virgin mother, that in His lifetime He performed mighty miracles observed by legions of His disciples and by His enemies as well. I testify that He had power over death because He was divine but that He willingly subjected Himself to death for our sake because for a period of time He was also mortal. I declare that in His willing submission to death He took upon Himself the sins of the world, paying an infinite price for every sorrow and sickness, every heartache and unhappiness from Adam to the end of the world. In doing so He conquered both the grave physically and hell spiritually and set the human family free. I bear witness that He was literally resurrected from the tomb and, after ascending to His Father to complete the process of that Resurrection, He appeared, repeatedly, to hundreds of disciples in the Old World and in the New. I know He is the Holy One of Israel, the Messiah who will one day come again in final glory, to reign on earth as Lord of lords and King of kings. I know that there is no other name given under heaven whereby a man can be saved and that only by relying wholly upon His merits, mercy, and everlasting grace19 can we gain eternal life.
My additional testimony regarding this resplendent doctrine is that in preparation for His millennial latter-day reign, Jesus has already come, more than once, in embodied majestic glory. In the spring of 1820, a 14-year-old boy, confused by many of these very doctrines that still confuse much of Christendom, went into a grove of trees to pray. In answer to that earnest prayer offered at such a tender age, the Father and the Son appeared as embodied, glorified beings to the boy prophet Joseph Smith. That day marked the beginning of the return of the true, New Testament gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and the restoration of other prophetic truths offered from Adam down to the present day.
I testify that my witness of these things is true and that the heavens are open to all who seek the same confirmation. Through the Holy Spirit of Truth, may we all know “the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom [He has] sent.”20 Then may we live Their teachings and be true Christians in deed, as well as in word, I pray in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.
NOTES

1. Isaiah 29:14. 2. Articles of Faith 1:1. 3. Paul F. Achtemeier, ed. (1985), 1099; emphasis added. 4. Constantinople, A.D. 381; Ephesus, A.D. 431; Chalcedon, A.D. 451. 5. Quoted in Owen Chadwick, Western Asceticism (1958), 235. 6. John 17:3; emphasis added. 7. For a thorough discussion of this issue, see Stephen E. Robinson, Are Mormons Christian? 71–89; see also Robert Millet, Getting at the Truth (2004), 106–22.8. See, for example, John 12:27–30; John 14:26; Romans 8:34; Hebrews 1:1–3. 9. John 5:19; see also John 14:10. 10. John 6:38. 11. John 15:24. 12. Matthew 19:17. 13. John 14:28. 14. Matthew 26:39. 15. Matthew 27:46. 16. Philippians 2:5–6. 17. See David L. Paulsen, “Early Christian Belief in a Corporeal Deity: Origen and Augustine as Reluctant Witnesses,” Harvard Theological Review, vol. 83, no. 2 (1990): 105–16; David L. Paulsen, “The Doctrine of Divine Embodiment: Restoration, Judeo-Christian, and Philosophical Perspectives,” BYU Studies, vol. 35, no. 4 (1996): 7–94; James L. Kugel, The God of Old: Inside the Lost World of the Bible (2003), xi–xii, 5–6, 104–6, 134–35; Clark Pinnock, Most Moved Mover: A Theology of God’s Openness (2001), 33–34. 18. See Romans 6:9; Alma 11:45. 19. See 1 Nephi 10:6; 2 Nephi 2:8; 31:19; Moroni 6:4; Joseph Smith Translation, Romans 3:24.20. John 17:3.
(Original address can be found in http://lds.org/conference/talk/display/0,5232,23-1-775-15,00.html)

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

To set the record straight...

Not everyone knows the name of the church - The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; chances are you may be more familiar with the term MORMON. This blog serves the first and foremost purpose of inviting you to come unto Christ, and secondly, to answer questions about the teachings of the Church. It was inspired after having read some "far off" ideas (to say the least) given as truth over the internet.
My name is Lucas Aidukaitis. The coolest thing about me is that I can speak my two native languages with an accent, so as to confuse everyone concerning my origin. I’ve been told I’m from England, France, Portugal, New York, or Brazil. Some can be true, if you meet me in person I will explain how, but the important thing is that I speak Portuguese and English because of my Brazilian parents - of whom I love very much - and my 4 years of education in America. I’m a college student who wants to become a renown medic - a lofty goal that will probably leave me studying for most of this and the next decade.
I was baptized into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when eight years old, March of 1995, by my father, Marcos Aidukaitis. The only thing I remember was the cold water and the family gathered together to celebrate the occasion. At the time I did not realize the scope or magnitude of the commitment I was making, but at any rate I’m glad I did so. When in my 19th year I decided to leave on my missionary service to Mesa, Arizona, remaining there from July of 2005 to August 2007. There I served at the trailer capital of the world Apache Junction, the wonderful Native Americans at Salt River Pima Maricopa Reservation (on the edge of both Mesa and Scottsdale), at Scottsdale itself, and concluding my service in east Mesa. Going back to my family was one of the most wonderful experiences I could’ve experienced; the time away from them serving a cause I knew was true really helped me appreciate more their company, and as consequence deepened my love to them all. I could not have asked for a better family to have been born to.
Hope this introduction gives you some perspective on who I am and my credentials for making this blog on the Mormons: I’m an active member of the said faith. It’s been my experience that a question not asked is a question not answered; this principle applies especially to the LDS Church, and as such I expect questions to be raised here at the blog. Let us remember however that the best source of answers the only one who can claim to be All-knowing: God Himself.